MENU
Investing in Energy
.png)
The energy sector is composed of high value industries that require significant investment to develop and maintain a wide range of infrastructure. Financing methods play a crucial role in ensuring the sector's growth and sustainability to match the ever-increasing demand for energy. The energy sector is governed by complex policies, some of which seek to guide future developments towards cleaner and more efficient energy sources. Financing methods for energy sector projects can vary by region depending on local policies and economic factors. Financing can come from governments, financial institutions or private entities depending on the project and required funding. Energy projects often require significant capital to construct and maintain, they can range from power generation assets, transmission, distribution and support infrastructure. Research and development for new energy technologies can be a costly process, but can also yield valuable results.
Energy sector projects can require massive upfront expenditure however they can also provide long term value in the form of energy which will always be in demand. As long as the project can deliver a worthwhile return on its investment, private investors and public entities will have an interest in financing the project.
Capital can come from sources ranging from the public to private sector. Private sector investment can come from a range of financial institutions or private investors who have enough capital and are willing to invest in such projects. Governments can apply financing from their budgets directly or form agreements with other financial entities to form partnerships or additional financing strategies.
A project financed through equity agreements will sell shares of ownership in the project where those who provide capital can receive their corresponding share in the profits of the project through dividends. This arrangement can also allow buying and selling of shares in addition to involvement in major decisions in the long term operation of the project depending on local regulations and agreements.
Debt financing offers a more hands off approach as the project is financed through an agreement that borrows money with the expectation of the loan getting repaid with interest over time. This can involve an agreement placing assets of the project up as collateral but will typically keep the agreement simplified as a loan with interest.
Returns are foundational to all investments whether the returns are purely financial or yield other forms of value. Return On Investment (ROI) is a measure of the profitability of an investment and is often used for evaluating the financial viability and profit potential of a project to investors. There are multiple ways to calculate the details but the basic premise is how much money or valuation increases can be made on the initial investment over a certain period of time.
The regulatory environment, including laws, regulations, incentive programs, policies and compliance requirements, can guide or govern how energy sector projects are approved and financed. Understanding and working within the regulatory environment is a major aspect in assessing the financial feasibility of energy projects. Familiarity with energy policies and compliance methods is tremendously useful for investors seeking to identify potential risks and opportunities of different projects.
All investments carry some degree of financial risk and the energy sector is no different. Massive capital can be organized and investments applied towards large infrastructure projects only to have a regulatory or legislative action force the project into cancellation. There can also be massive mismanagement problems, cost overruns, delays and project-side interruptions that can disrupt or bankrupt a project before it completes. Sometimes the costs increase beyond the initial estimates to the point of making the final operation of the project financially non-viable. Certain incentive programs that guaranteed a particular source of revenue or support could expire and not be renewed by newly established policy makers. There are a range of uncertainties associated with energy sector projects which emphasizes the importance of financial risk management.
A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is a long-term contract between an energy buyer and energy producer. The energy producer is typically a company selling energy from its own power generation assets. The buyer is often an electric utility but it could also be a government entity or corporation. PPAs are often positioned as agreements for clean energy sources in order to satisfy certain requirements or sustainability goals set out by governments or private institutions. However they are also tremendously useful as a financial instrument in guaranteeing a revenue stream to investors and stakeholders.
In order to encourage more private sector involvement in financing clean energy projects, a range of government programs have been established to reassure and incentivize investing in these projects.
Subsidies are financial provisions from a government attempting to keep the cost of a particular product low or competitive, such as additional funding for particular energy projects. Subsidies can take many forms and be tied to various requirements or woven into other incentive programs. Private investors assessing cash flow potential of different projects could be encouraged to go with a project that qualifies for subsidies when they would otherwise go with a different project.
Under a Feed-in Tariff system, qualifying energy producers are guaranteed a fixed price per unit of energy generated over a predetermined period of time. This price is typically set at an attractive rate which is often higher than the typical market rate for energy produced from conventional fossil fuel sources. Consequently, investors and producers of qualifying energy sources have assurances on their returns for contributing to the energy grid, which incentivizes the initial investment.
Tax credits can be as useful as cash when the tax bill comes due. Unlike tax deductions which only reduce a taxable amount of income, tax credits are effectively 1:1 in valuation on the final tax bill. A tax credit in the energy sector typically takes the form of a reduction in the amount of tax owed by an individual or a business entity for investing in or operating qualifying energy technologies. Tax credits can be applied to personal or corporate income taxes, effectively decreasing the final tax liability for the involved entities.
The Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) is a metric used to compare the costs of different energy generation technologies on a per-unit basis using a set of inputs, estimates, and calculations. This metric is useful for individuals and business entities weighing investment options for new energy projects. LCOE projections attempt to calculate a long-term cost basis for specific projects; however, it is often misused in the broader landscape of energy policy and debates.
Ideally, LCOE takes into account the entire lifecycle of a power generation project, including capital costs, fuel costs, operations and maintenance expenses, and the expected energy output over the project's lifetime. By calculating the LCOE, we can estimate the average cost basis of producing electricity from various projects, facilitating informed decision-making on the financial side in the energy sector.
Effective policies and incentive strategies guiding energy sector financing are of paramount importance in facilitating prosperous growth and sustainable development in the global energy industry. Well crafted energy financing policies are pivotal for ensuring the sustainable development of the energy sector, both economically and environmentally. If financing for the energy sector is incentivized to waste resources or develop a grid that lacks reliable infrastructure, the results can be devastating in terms of cost and economic disruptions. Economic prosperity and environmental stability both require a clean energy mix capable of meeting the ever-increasing global demand for energy. Effective financing strategies operating within a system of well crafted incentives are essential to building and maintaining a clean energy mix.
Financing plays a particularly significant role in the nuclear sector considering the historically high capital costs, long project timelines, and complex regulatory environments that accompany the development of conventional nuclear power plants. Nuclear energy, if scaled, is a clean and reliable power source that could be part of a global energy mix to mitigate climate change. Traditional nuclear power plants require substantial upfront investments, as well as ongoing maintenance and operational costs. Once operational, nuclear power plants provide a reliable source of clean energy that is more resilient to other economic factors such as fossil fuel price fluctuations or supply line disruptions.
Financing for traditional nuclear has been very costly, it is routine for public entities to get involved as the costs can often exceed $10 billion per Gigawatt of capacity. The recent construction of two AP1000s at Plant Vogtle in Georgia is estimated to tally more than $30 billion. (AMY, 2023) As valuable as this generating station will be for decades to come, this is a substantial amount of capital to invest upfront.
The landscape of nuclear is expanding with the commercial development of small modular reactors (SMRs) offering more financing opportunities. SMRs can greatly reduce capital costs and completion timelines, making nuclear energy projects more accessible and attractive to a wider range of investors.
The higher the required capital expense is for a project, the higher the barrier to entry will be for economic engagement with a nuclear project. Reducing the cost of capital to $100 million, such as the cost of Last Energy’s PWR-20, will open the opportunity for private capital and a large market of investors. Paired with a fully modular design, reducing construction time to approximately 24 months, the investment cost and timeline creates an great opportunity for private capital investors.
The $100 million price tag of a PWR-20 plant alleviates the need for government financing. Traditionally, governments would need to be involved with the financing process of a nuclear plant as the capital expenditure would be too large for a private investor to find attractive. Public sector financing can also present additional requirements making private sector financing more flexible.
PPAs are a win-win for both energy customers and project investors. PPAs allow customers to only pay for energy, rather than requiring a massive upfront capital investment in a power plant. And the long-term returns offered by PPAs makes the initial capital investment more attractive to investors. Customers seeking to buy energy from Last Energy can enter a PPA so they only need to buy energy as if they are buying it from the grid or any other utility. Capital investors take on the initial cost and see long term returns through the continuous revenue stream guaranteed through PPAs.
